<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bouchala Tarek</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bachir Abdelhadi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Benoudjit Azeddine</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New Contactless Eddy Current Non-destructive Methodology of Electric Conductivity Measurement, ISSn / e-ISSN 1058-9759 / 1477-2671</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10589759.2014.992431?journalCode=gnte20</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Volume 30</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pp. 63-73 </style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this paper, a new method of contactless electric conductivity measurement is developed. This method is essentially based on the association of the coupled electric field forward model, which we have recently developed, with a simple and efficient research algorithm. The proposed method is very fast because 1.3&amp;nbsp;s are sufficient to calculate electric conductivity, in a CPU of 2&amp;nbsp;GHz and RAM of 3&amp;nbsp;GB, for a starting research interval of 1.72–17.2 %IACS and tolerance of 1.72&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;10&lt;sup&gt;−&amp;nbsp;5&lt;/sup&gt; %IACS. The study of the calculation time according to mesh density and starting interval width has showed that an optimal choice has to be made in order to improve the rapidity while preserving its precision. Considering its rapidity and its simplicity of implementation, this method is more adapted, in comparison to direct current techniques using Van der Pauw geometry, for automated applications.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"> Issue 1</style></issue></record></records></xml>