@article {5148,
	title = {SKACICM a method for development of knowledge management and innovation system e-KnowSphere,  ISSN /e-ISSN 1755-8255 / 1755-8263},
	journal = {International, Journal. Knowledge and Web Intelligence},
	volume = {Vol 5},
	number = {issue 2},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {105-126},
	abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to propose a hybrid method SKACICM of development of knowledge management systems. Based on weaknesses of the method of performance dashboards SKANDIA, we proposed a pragmatisation and adaptation of Skandia to give ASKANDIA, by enrichment of its performance book. We ameliorated CICM model against the requirements of GERAM to give ACICM model by mappings between their proposed metamodels. We tried to hybridise ACICM, ASKANDIA and business intelligence to propose a new method SKACICM of development of knowledge management systems. We applied SKACICM on a cement company to develop software containing three main modules, module knowledge management, module business intelligence and performance dashboard system. The developed system ameliorated the performance of the enterprise by 26\% and could be generalised to other manufacturing or service systems.},
	url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1504/IJKWI.2015.075153},
	author = {Aitouche Samia and Mouss Mohamed Djamel and Kaanit Abdelghafour and Bouhafna Khayreddine}
}
@article {5042,
	title = {Comparison and prioritisation of measurement methods of intellectual capital; IC-dVal, VAIC and NICI, ISSN / e-ISSN  1479-4853 / 1479-4861},
	journal = {International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital },
	volume = {12},
	number = {2},
	year = {2015},
	abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to compare between three methods of intellectual capital (IC) measurement; intellectual capital dynamic valuation (IC-dVal), value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC), and national intellectual capital index (NICI). The three methods are the most used in practice; we used 24 criteria covering important aspects of IC to do general comparison. According to ten criteria, we compared and prioritised them using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The results of this comparison show that the methods are close for some criteria and distant for other criteria. The prioritisation with AHP found that NICI method is the most method responding to the criteria, namely: macro measure, guidelines of the method, dynamic valuation, involved levels of business, usability by stakeholders, covered aspects of IC, quantifiability, frequency of use and applicability. IC-dVal is the second one and VAIC is the third method responding to the criteria. The analysis could give more significant results using larger set of criteria. This is the first research prioritising methods of measurement of IC using AHP analysis.},
	url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276178196_Comparison_and_prioritisation_of_measurement_methods_of_intellectual_capital_IC-dVal_VAIC_and_NICI},
	author = {Aitouche Samia and Mouss Nadia Kinza and Mouss Mohamed Djamel and Kaanit Abdelghafour and Marref Tarek}
}
@article {3072,
	title = {Comparison and prioritization of measurement methods of intellectual capital; IC-dVal, VAIC and NICI, Janvier, ISSN/ISBN 1755-8263/1479-4853},
	journal = { IJLIC International journal of learning and intellectual capital },
	volume = {Vol. 12},
	number = {N{\textdegree}2},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {pp 122-145 },
	abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to compare between three methods of intellectual capital (IC) measurement; intellectual capital dynamic valuation (IC-dVal), value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC), and national intellectual capital index (NICI). The three methods are the most used in practice; we used 24 criteria covering important aspects of IC to do general comparison. According to ten criteria, we compared and prioritised them using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The results of this comparison show that the methods are close for some criteria and distant for other criteria. The prioritisation with AHP found that NICI method is the most method responding to the criteria, namely: macro measure, guidelines of the method, dynamic valuation, involved levels of business, usability by stakeholders, covered aspects of IC, quantifiability, frequency of use and applicability. IC-dVal is the second one and VAIC is the third method responding to the criteria. The analysis could give more significant results using larger set of criteria. This is the first research prioritising methods of measurement of IC using AHP analysis.},
	url = {https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v12y2015i2p122-145.html},
	author = {Aitoche Samia and Mouss Leila Hayet and Kaanit Abdelghafour}
}
@conference {4689,
	title = {A hybrid method to develop a knowledge management system},
	booktitle = {EKNOW 2014 International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management Barcelone, Espagne},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {pp 77-83},
	author = {Aitouche Samia and Mouss Med Djamel and Mouss Leila Hayet and Kaanit Abdelghafour and Boutarfa Youcef and Rezki Djamil}
}
@proceedings {3559,
	title = {Proposition d\&rsquo;une nouvelle approche pour le choix des investissements bas{\'e}e sur les arbres de d{\'e}cision flous . May, 11-13, Batna, Algeria },
	journal = {ICIEM{\textquoteright}14, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {pp. 353-359},
	url = {http://www.univ-batna,.dz/iciem2014/index.html},
	author = {Kaanit Abdelghafour}
}
@article {3354,
	title = {l\&rsquo;am{\'e}lioration du processus de fabrication d\&rsquo;une entreprise alg{\'e}rienne par le niveau sigma,  ISSN/ISBN 1112-3613 / 2437-0843},
	journal = {El-Bahith Review},
	volume = {Volume 14},
	number = {Num{\'e}ro 14},
	year = {2014},
	pages = { Pages 61-73 },
	abstract = {Ce modeste travail a pour objectif d{\textquoteright}{\'e}valuer la performance du processus de fabrication de l{\textquoteright}entreprise par un nouvel outil de mesure, en l{\textquoteright}occurrence le niveau sigma dont la finalit{\'e} consiste {\`a} chiffrer les couts inh{\'e}rents {\`a} chaque sous processus de production, mesurer les niveaux six sigma des sous processus adjacents, les pond{\'e}rer pour parvenir {\`a} calculer le DPMO (Defects Per Million Opportunity) et {\'e}valuer ainsi la comp{\'e}titivit{\'e} globale de l{\textquoteright}entreprise. Ce nouvel outil de mesure de la performance du processus de fabrication (niveau sigma) sera appliqu{\'e} {\`a} une entreprise de fabrication de Bouteilles A Gaz (BAG {\textendash} Batna).},
	url = {https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/260},
	author = {Aoueg Hicham and Kaanit Abdelghafour}
}
@proceedings {3583,
	title = {Amelioration of CICM Model against GERAM requirements  May 12-14 University 8 Mai 1945-Guelma, Algeria},
	journal = {CSIP{\textquoteright}13; The third International Conference on System and Information Processing},
	year = {2013},
	url = {http://www.univ-guelma.dz/icsip13/index.html},
	author = {Kaanit Abdelghafour}
}
